Username: 
Password: 
Restrict session to IP 

Testing the Simulation Hypothesis

Global Rank: 231
Totalscore: 92244
Posts: 1680
Thanks: 1358
UpVotes: 920
Registered: 16y 280d




Last Seen: 2s
The User is Online
Testing the Simulation Hypothesis
Google/translate0Thank You!0Good Post!0Bad Post! link
Do we live in a simulation?

To find out, i crafted this experiment.

We use the double slit experiment, and measure the particles passing through.
This should make the waves collapse.

Now, we increase the rate of the particles vastly.

My theory is, that even though the particles are observed, not all waves collapse, due to limited CPU power.

This means even tho we counted *all* particles left or right, the picture at the wall is a mixture of waves and slots.
This would be a hint to be in a simulation.

- gizmore
The geeks shall inherit the properties and methods of object earth.
Global Rank: 1
Totalscore: 759092
Posts: 437
Thanks: 496
UpVotes: 469
Registered: 15y 119d












The User is Offline
RE: Testing the Simulation Hypothesis
Google/translate1Thank You!1Good Post!0Bad Post! link
How again were you counting the particles without the waves collapsing?

"Now, we increase the rate of the particles vastly." Now there's an understatement. :p

Anyway, they no longer do full scale simulation. They pretty quickly figured they only had to simulate that one brain and some roughly believable inputs.
Global Rank: 231
Totalscore: 92244
Posts: 1680
Thanks: 1358
UpVotes: 920
Registered: 16y 280d




Last Seen: 2s
The User is Online
RE: Testing the Simulation Hypothesis
Google/translate0Thank You!0Good Post!0Bad Post! link
We count the amount on the left and the right slit.

So the picture at the wall should be particle view (2 big slits)

Now we increase the throughput.

If it's a simulation, the number of particles collapsing might be too high, resulting in a mixture of wave view and particle view.
The geeks shall inherit the properties and methods of object earth.
Global Rank: 1
Totalscore: 759092
Posts: 437
Thanks: 496
UpVotes: 469
Registered: 15y 119d












The User is Offline
RE: Testing the Simulation Hypothesis
Google/translate1Thank You!1Good Post!0Bad Post! link
Quote from gizmore
Jun 26, 2024 - 15:46:28

This means even tho we counted *all* particles left or right, the picture at the wall is a mixture of waves and slots.

My point being that if the result of the wall is a mixture, you cannot have counted all particles, AFAIK. The two "slots" on the wall are the result of the collapse happening at the slits, which is due to the counting. If you have a "wave view", the collapse didn't happen until it hit the wall (or: your eye, measuring device, whatever), meaning that the particle didn't just go through one of the slits and you cannot have counted it.

Not that any of it matters much. It is quite an assumption that "limited CPU power" would stop collapse. You could just as easily assume the opposite: collapse reduces complex waves to simple "billiard-ball" particles. Perhaps they will collapse before even reaching the slits to preserve resources!
tunelko, quangntenemy, TheHiveMind, Z, balicocat, Ge0, samuraiblanco, arraez, jcquinterov, hophuocthinh, alfamen2, burhanudinn123, Ben_Dover, stephanduran89, braddie0, SwolloW, dangarbri, csuquvq have subscribed to this thread and receive emails on new posts.
1 people are watching the thread at the moment.
This thread has been viewed 2284 times.